I would like to talk about my experience in Europe
because there was so much that happened there to me and to many
other people. There were several other American Jesuits there-I
think it was ten or twelve at the tine and it was a wonderful
group-as well as people and Jesuits from all over the world who
were there for their studies. So it was a very rich experience
all by itself.
But the Rector was very anxious for us to travel,
unlike what might have happened here in the United States. They
were practically pushing us out the door in the summertime so
we would spend at least two months, maybe more, traveling around
the country. We did that for three summers, which gave us a tremendous
insight into Europe and into many other things. It was a very
wonderful experience.
One of the nice parts of it was when my parents
came from the United States for my ordination. There were about
thirty-five of us who were ordained at the time. It was very impressive,
and they thought it was just great. We had the first mass there
and all that kind of thing. It was something that was very good
for them and very good for me, and very good I think in many ways
for others in our families.
I would like to add something connected with
my ordination. At the time, the ordaining Bishop was the local
assistant bishop, if you will, in Belgium. Over the years, of
course, he developed in many ways. He turned out to be Cardinal
Suenens who was one of the four major leaders in the Vatican Council
II. He did many things not only during the Council, but after
the Council. That was also a great experience, which was part
of that whole period in which I was able to learn a lot and do
a lot when I was in Europe.
Another important development in the Catholic
Church, if you will, at the time was the Ecumenical Movement,
as everyone is aware, I'm sure. When it got started it went very
slowly because it was something new and different. Almost by accident
I got involved at Fairfield. Through that I helped the Bishop.
The Bishop actually appointed me and one other Jesuit to direct
the Ecumenical Movement in the diocese so one thing led to another.
At one point I went to a meeting held in Atlantic
City of priests who were involved in the new Ecumenical Movement.
It was very instructive. It was clear that we were just getting
off the ground, just beginning, and that there were a lot of things
to learn, a lot of things to do.
Later on, when I got back, I decided maybe we
could do something to make it easier for us to learn and to do
things in this area since it's all so new. I sat down and sent
a letter to the Cardinal in Baltimore and asked him if he would
support a meeting to do this. To my surprise he was very enthusiastic
about it, got right back to me, and said, 'Now, you don't have
to worry about it. I'll get my staff. They will do the whole thing.
You just kind of lead them or tell them where they should go,"
and so on, "and this should work out." We had the first
meeting in Baltimore. To my surprise there were loads of Catholic
priests there; and to even my greater surprise there were a number
of Protestant ministers there who came from all over the country.
I didn't know exactly how that happened, but there they were.
That was quite successful and it led to
further meetings like that in New York and St. Louis, and all
over the country. All together I managed eight of those in getting
the bishops and their staffs to create the thing, in a sense,
in the physical way. Each one of those was quite successful. It
just increased and increased, and more Protestants came. It became,
in a way, the main way to discuss the Ecumenical Movement among
American priests and also Protestant ministers that I think did
a lot to promote the Ecumenical Movement.
Connected with this was the fact that I was asked
to join the National Council of Churches as an unofficial Roman
Catholic representative. I was there for a few years. That was
something I think was very fruitful not only for myself, personally,
but for connections between the Catholic Church and the Protestant
churches leading to genuine ecumenical development. As I said,
I had led this group of meetings for some time. It was the board
of directors, if you will, of the National Council of Churches
that I finally turned to and said, "Look, I'm just an individual
here. This is too big, I think, for me. I'd like to turn it over
to you." When I asked them if they would manage it in the
future they agreed and that continued. This has gone on ever since
although, of course, I'm sure today it takes on a different look
and action.
One of the great things that has happened to
me in recent years has been the University of Scranton Press.
How it happened was: I'd always been interested in writing; I
had written a few small books, and people would come to me and
ask me for help in doing this kind of thing in their work, the
various professors. I helped them as best I could, they were grateful,
and one thing led to another.
After a while it became clear to me that actually
what I was doing, I was becoming a kind of publisher in that I
was helping people to publish. So then I became more specific
about it, clear about it, direct about it, and decided I would
be a publisher and I would call it the University of Scranton
Press. That's how it started. It was small at first, but it got
good support certainly from the faculty-the faculty members were
very much in favor of it-and the administration was also helpful
in many ways. It grew gradually and gradually. Finally it settled
down as being a really sound project. When I decided it was time
to retire I turned it over to a former director who had done this
before. He was only too happy to do this, and he is now running
it and doing a very good job.
The other thing is something that has happened
here at Campion Center: the Oral History Program that has begun
here, something I was asked to do though I had really no background
in it. It has started off small, but it has been quite successful
with the various members of the community. We are taking the histories
down and trying to present them as best we can, and putting them
out as small booklets. At this point we are up to close to seventy-five
and almost ready to move on to other parts of the province to
do certain things along the same line that I think people are
already asking us to do.
Both of these things have been so important not
only to me, but in many other ways that there's no other explanation
for this except for the fact that we're getting guidance from
God in doing this and that He is leading us into this kind of
future in a way that is beyond my own powers, but is making it
succeed on its own.
Just some thoughts about spiritual life
and spiritual direction. The great teachers, like Dick [LaSad]
and [DeSales], have said over and over again in a variety of ways
that there is what they call a continuation in God's relationship
with us. That's a bit of an unusual term, but I think they are
trying to say that we sometimes think that God is acting for us
and with us and to us in only small ways here and there when He
can think of it. But continuation means that He continues to look
after us, continues to bring us help, continues to support us,
continues to lead us; and we need to surrender ourselves to that,
to allow it to happen, so that the things that he is leading us
to and with and for can really happen.
I might add that the wording, if you will,
of some of these spiritual discussions can change from time to
time. So I'd like to suggest a formula or a phrase that sums up,
in a modern way, this continuance of God's love for us. We might
say something like, "The guidance of the spirit." The
guidance of the spirit. I think that speaks for itself.